Jump to content
IGNORED

Lori Alexander- the Mindless Mentor: Part 8


Recommended Posts

If Ken had an ounce of sense he'd be appalled at being reduced to nothing more than an animal with no self control.  

As it stands, he can't pass a woman on the beach without having to pack up his dizzy little wife and run for the hills.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 436
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Koala said:

If Ken had an ounce of sense he'd be appalled at being reduced to nothing more than an animal with no self control.  

As it stands, he can't pass a woman on the beach without having to pack up his dizzy little wife and run for the hills.  

Worse than an animal.  Even an un-neutered dog* can see a female one and not automatically have to hump it. 

 

 

*Snark aside, spay and neuter your pets!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Hera said:

Worse than an animal.  Even an un-neutered dog* can see a female one and not automatically have to hump it. 

 

 

*Snark aside, spay and neuter your pets!  

 

idk, we have a neutered male cat and a spayed female cat (and another neutered male), and that one neutered male will still try to mate with both the spayed female and the neutered male CON.STANT.LY. The female has gotten to the point where she just hauls off and smacks him across the head if he so much as looks in her direction (but he still tries to sneak-attack her). The other male tolerates it more or less if he's got nothing better going on. Horny cat also tried to get busy with my husband's beard once. Husband put a stop to that right quick.

I should rename horny cat Ken. 

Except ... ew. 

** And yes, he really is neutered. After he escaped the house for the million billionth time, got flattened by a car and had the head of his  leg snapped off last year -- and still didn't have his horny libido dampened one bit, we asked the vet to PLEASE check for an undescended testicle. Nope. He's just a horny-ass little dickweed. No random testicles or anything else floating around up in there. Little fucker.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, polecat said:

idk, we have a neutered male cat and a spayed female cat (and another neutered male), and that one neutered male will still try to mate with both the spayed female and the neutered male CON.STANT.LY.  Little fucker.

 

Literally!

We have a male dog like that too.  Not quite as bad as your cat, but he bothered our late female dog as often as he could even after being neutered.

Hmmm, is it safe to put saltpeter in pet food?? (jk)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the one who has lust in her heart when we're out and see attractive women. My husband is mostly like, "eh, what are the beers here?"

I wonder what Lori would say if I wrote in with THAT problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, polecat said:

idk, we have a neutered male cat and a spayed female cat (and another neutered male), and that one neutered male will still try to mate with both the spayed female and the neutered male CON.STANT.LY. The female has gotten to the point where she just hauls off and smacks him across the head if he so much as looks in her direction (but he still tries to sneak-attack her). The other male tolerates it more or less if he's got nothing better going on. Horny cat also tried to get busy with my husband's beard once. Husband put a stop to that right quick.

I should rename horny cat Ken. 

Except ... ew. 

** And yes, he really is neutered. After he escaped the house for the million billionth time, got flattened by a car and had the head of his  leg snapped off last year -- and still didn't have his horny libido dampened one bit, we asked the vet to PLEASE check for an undescended testicle. Nope. He's just a horny-ass little dickweed. No random testicles or anything else floating around up in there. Little fucker.

 

Thankyou for cheering me up after a strange couple of days. It's good to have a chuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

@polecat

First of all, not all large breasts can be easily hidden, not in blouses, not in t-shirts and certainly not in swimming suits. Not on fat women, not on skinny women, not on medium-framed women. But second of all, why the hell should we have to hide our breasts and pretend like they don't exist? Lori walks around with her shirt cut down to her waist, but women who happen to have large breasts are supposed to wear goddamn barrels to appease her leering pervy husband? Well, I have super extra jumbo sized breasts, and I don't go to huge lengths to hide them. They are what they are. I don't appreciate creepers staring at them, and I agree with the first woman -- I feel like men who go out of their way to be ogle-y are the ones with issues.

Amen.  Mine are not extra-large, but they are noticeable.  Sometimes I dress to show them off and sometimes they decide to show themselves off.  It all depends. 

Quote

@Koala

Further, if a man treats women differently based on what they're wearing (dress= respect / bikini= sex object), then the problem is with the man's integrity, not the woman's clothing.

Exactly.

Quote

Lori says:

Do these women know that they aren't only causing teenagers and young men to lust but older men and even grandfathers to lust too?

Sometimes that's my intent... and sometimes I just want to be cool and comfortable because it's summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A commenter is talking about the sin of plunging necklines. Who wants to whip out the photo?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gobsmacked said:

Thankyou for cheering me up after a strange couple of days. It's good to have a chuckle.

Can I interest you in a cat who can provide you with a constant supply of chuckles? ;)

I'm sorry you've had some strange days, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, AlwaysDiscerning said:

A commenter is talking about the sin of plunging necklines. Who wants to whip out the photo?!

greg's wedding.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Ken should control himself better. I get the feeling this is what he looks like out in public quite often when he sees good looking women, or cleavage, or butts:

wolf eyes.png

eyes popping out funny.png

wolf eyes 2.png

The problem is him and his penis, and not the women. A thong is perfectly acceptable at a beach in SoCal. Full stop. And she should know this if she walks there "every Saturday morning."

31 minutes ago, molecule said:

greg's wedding.jpg

Can someone *PLEASE* post this to her comments? She's a raving hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am betting there will be a post this week about how America is going to hell now that Cruz is out. I marvel at the nuts like Glenn Beck fasting and praying. Sorry folks, God wants Trump! I feel like chanting that to annoy them. 

I can't stop laughing at this

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlwaysDiscerning said:

I am betting there will be a post this week about how America is going to hell now that Cruz is out. I marvel at the nuts like Glenn Beck fasting and praying. Sorry folks, God wants Trump! I feel like chanting that to annoy them. 

I can't stop laughing at this

 

Gross! Is he trying to hand sex her a la Josh Duggar?

The look on his face is pretty damned skeevy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lori:

Quote

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools.

Oh, this is fun!

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools BLOGS.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools CARS.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools LAWNMOWERS.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools THE INTERNET.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools CYBER KNIFE.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools CAT FOOD.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools TOOTHBRUSHES.

There is nothing in the Bible about public schools TELEPHONES.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course our founding fathers were 'homeschooled.'* That's because there were no public schools as we know them in those days! :roll:

 

*and their mothers likely were not their primary teachers once they'd learned to read and write, either--they often had hired tutors teaching them, or they went to private academies. Most mothers couldn't teach their sons Latin, Greek, rhetoric, and all the other subjects of a classical education the founding fathers received, because women weren't generally educated beyond the very basics back then. You know, the way Lori thinks women should be educated now.:?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a lot of Christians who teach  public schools. They are not just "strangers who know not God nor His ways," as Lori claims. 

Quote

Boys will be exposed to all sorts of immodesty and indecency. Many grown men are addicted to porn today due to being exposed to it when they were young at school. 

But what if their homeschooling moms take them on an outing to the beach to learn about God's wonderful creation? And what if non-Christian non-career woman has decided to hang out at the beach working on her butt tan? And what if she is lying there with her whole bottom exposed? Then won't this make the boys addicted to wanting to see naked women in the future? 

And wait, didn't Lori send her kids to private school? Why does she set up this dichotomy of extremes--either completely godless and evil public schools or wonderful and perfect homeschool? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lori seems to be ignoring this question:

Quote

I've been thinking about lately, and I'd like to ask your opinion if you don't mind. I've read about a study (maybe more than one?) conducted that showed that when women wear pants, men's eyes are almost immediately drawn to the crotch area (the pants didn't even have to be skin tight)... Not necessarily in a perverted way, but because of the shape that it makes, that's what the eyes notice. I have also heard some Christian men admit that this is where their eyes are drawn when they see women in jeans. 

While I enjoy skirts and dresses, I have always worn pants, as well. If some Christian men admit that jeans are a stumbling block for them, should we only wear skirts? It seems hard to find a healthy balance these days between overly modest/legalistic and not quite modest enough. I appreciate the truth that you share on your blog and I'd love to hear your opinion on this matter.

Heh...that was 12 hours ago, and Lori is still ignoring her.

Another reader even chimed in, ending with:

Quote

 I, too, would enjoy hearing Lori's perspective on this.

Lori's perspective is that she's wearing shorts as long as Ken still thinks her skin looks good.

Quote

I told Ken the real reason I decided to wear skirts was because my skin looked so bad.  He told me it didn't at all.

Quote

The next day, I woke up and put on shorts...I like my shorts. 

 

3 minutes ago, molecule said:

And wait, didn't Lori send her kids to private school? Why does she set up this dichotomy of extremes--either completely godless and evil public schools or wonderful and perfect homeschool? 

They also attended public school, yet according to Lori they are all "walking with Jesus".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised she let this comment through. Maybe this is one of her feisty days? Copying before the delete key gets to it:

Quote

The founding fathers were homeschooled, **not** because the parents decided to do so, but because there were **no** public schools to attend. Government supported public schools began ***after*** the American Revolution. 

Also, as you are an advocate of homeschooling K-12, how do you justify your decision**not** to homeschool all your children for 12 years?

I've looked into a few of the founding fathers' early education (Washington, Adams, Jefferson) and so far NONE was homeschooled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only was Jefferson educated at schools from the age of 5, he proposed the founding of taxpayer supported public schools for all children in 1779 and in 1812 founded the deliberately secular University of Virginia.

Not the fundies favorite founding father but still, Lori just pulls crap out of her @$$ and needs to be stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Koala said:

We don't want these women around our families, Maria, to protect the men in our lives! 

But Lori, one of your own daughters dresses quite provocatively ... and your daughter-in-law, a lovely woman in her own right, fills out a bikini nicely. Do you not want either of them around or in your family? Or is it just a matter of those "other" women?

Hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Florita said:

 

Quote

The founding fathers were homeschooled, **not** because the parents decided to do so, but because there were **no** public schools to attend. Government supported public schools began ***after*** the American Revolution. 

Also, as you are an advocate of homeschooling K-12, how do you justify your decision**not** to homeschool all your children for 12 years?

 

Her response:

Quote

Yes, but I was trying to prove the point that one doesn't have to go to public schools to get a good education and do well in life. 

I didn't know about homeschooling until my children were in junior high. It wasn't very common back then. I homeschooled them through junior high and then they went to a private Christian High School. {I was very sick during these years.} I would never have sent them to public schools with what they are teaching children now in them. It is so much worse then it was when my children went to it in elementary school.

She was most definitely not trying to make the point that you don't have to go to public schools to get a good education and do well.  She is making the point that public schools are evil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Florita said:

Surprised she let this comment through. Maybe this is one of her feisty days? Copying before the delete key gets to it:

I've looked into a few of the founding fathers' early education (Washington, Adams, Jefferson) and so far NONE was homeschooled.

Lori replied:

Quote

Yes, but I was trying to prove the point that one doesn't have to go to public schools to get a good education and do well in life. 

I didn't know about homeschooling until my children were in junior high. It wasn't very common back then. I homeschooled them through junior high and then they went to a private Christian High School. {I was very sick during these years.} I would never have sent them to public schools with what they are teaching children now in them. It is so much worse then it was when my children went to it in elementary school.

That is a flat out lie:

Quote

When Cassi was in junior high, I enrolled her at the local public junior high school.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Homeschool co-opts....

Tell me again how great some of this homeskooling is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, docmom said:

Not only was Jefferson educated at schools from the age of 5, he proposed the founding of taxpayer supported public schools for all children in 1779 and in 1812 founded the deliberately secular University of Virginia.

Not the fundies favorite founding father but still, Lori just pulls crap out of her @$$ and needs to be stopped.

From the biography of James Madison:

 

Quote

At age 12, Madison’s father sent him to Donald Robertson’s school in King and Queen County. There Madison studied arithmetic and geography, learned Latin and Greek, acquired a reading knowledge of French, and began to study algebra and geometry. Madison never forgot his teacher, later acknowledging “all that I have been in life I owe largely to that man.”

I guess he just forgot to thank his mother for her hard work at the SOTDRT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • FundieFarmer locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.