Jump to content
  • entries
    169
  • comments
    264
  • views
    8,687

Picture of the Day ~ 12.21.15


Curious

1,255 views

Yesterday I posted the baby reindeer, today we have the mommy ;)  This was done with pretty much every type of marker I have, I think.   The antlers aren't exactly the same on both sides, but I did use the same colors evenly on both sides.  I just colored a section on the right and then colored a corresponding section on the left. I added the little tuft of different colored fur on the chest because the cover has this image and I liked the way it looked.

reindeer.thumb.jpg.4bb5b39f132ffa1df68ca

This is from the book:

(Free Jinger amazon affiliate link)

  • Upvote 9

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Tikobaby

Posted

Very colorful and I like the texture look on the reindeer's face.  Pretty!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Curious

Posted

Thanks @Tikobaby   I wasn't too thrilled with it when I was working on it.  The antlers took me forever.   Now that it's done, I really like how it turned out.   I think the brown in from the pentel felt tip set.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Fascinated

Posted

I agree!  You've got great textures. That seems like it was a laborious process. She looks awesome!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
violynn

Posted

I need this book too!  Your pages always inspire me to try new techniques, Furious.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Curious

Posted

1 hour ago, violynnkelly said:

I need this book too!  Your pages always inspire me to try new techniques, Furious.  

Aww thank you!

IMO, you can't go wrong with any of Thaneeya MaCardle's books.  They all have fun designs in them and they range from pretty simple to fairly intricate and cover a wide range of topics.

If you like her designs, you might want to get her new big, spiral bound books.  I have most of her books as singles already, so ended up with a bunch of duplicates when I bought her 2 new bigger books, but I'm fine with that because it gives me a chance to try something different than I did the first time.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
violynn

Posted

I believe there are two of her books under the tree waiting for me this year.  I know her last big spiral is there, I put it in the cart and guarded it all the way to the checkout line.  Bless the child who states I'm too hard to buy for and takes me withher eveey year. ;) 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Curious

Posted

On 12/24/2015 at 11:39 AM, thebestusername said:

I love the horns. Have you heard of the colorfy app?

I have colorfy on my husband's phone for when I get bored when we are out :)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • RebeccaRay

      Posted

      15 hours ago, SoSoNosy said:

      Probably.  She showed a big picture of the balloon release but I didn't look closely.  I was just glad that the family gathered around her when she needed it.  The lady's name was something like Tuff Decisions.

      She's just as good of a source as wacb

    • Cam

      Posted (edited)

      1 hour ago, viii said:

      I don't think I'd find it understandable if it was me. I'd side-eye my sister if she didn't attend my child's funeral, especially knowing how deep the grief is. I would hope that my sister would be there for me, since she would be able to relate the most. 

      I understand how some trauma can be triggering, but I also think there comes a point where we need to be there for loved ones. If Joy had just lost her daughter within the last year, that might have been a different story. 

      It's a fine line between protecting yourself and supporting loved ones. 


      We don’t know what goes on behind the scenes. Joy may have had a conversation with Jill on the phone discussing why she might not be able to attend and offer her condolences that way. Maybe even with a promise to get together soon in a more private manner.

      My brother suffered a devastating family loss. Most of our other family members went to the funeral. I was unable to attend due to extenuating circumstances. My other sister was out of town. When she returned a couple weeks later. she, I and our husbands took the three hour trip to visit Brother taking huge amounts of food and spending all day with him. It was very meaningful.

       

      55 minutes ago, Mama Mia said:

      It also might just be that Joy had the stomach flu or some other normal reason. Or a kid had to go to the ER 
       



      Definitely a possibility. I was thinking what if her kid(s) had pink eye or something.
       

      Edited by Cam
    • Mama Mia

      Posted

      3 minutes ago, viii said:

      I don't think I'd find it understandable if it was me. I'd side-eye my sister if she didn't attend my child's funeral, especially knowing how deep the grief is. I would hope that my sister would be there for me, since she would be able to relate the most. 

      I understand how some trauma can be triggering, but I also think there comes a point where we need to be there for loved ones. If Joy had just lost her daughter within the last year, that might have been a different story. 

      It's a fine line between protecting yourself and supporting loved ones. 

      I don’t know. I think I’d understand if it was just too much for her to handle. Everyone is different. And it’s not like she doesn’t have multiple other sisters and her mom there. As well as brothers, in-laws, friends, etc…..If Joy was her sole support it might be different. 

      It also might just be that Joy had the stomach flu or some other normal reason. Or a kid had to go to the ER for a fall , or one of the kids was having a meltdown cause they were scared of balloons so she took them somewhere else during the release,  I think with that huge a family it would be difficult to get everyone in one spot  for anything. Especially when so many have little kids. 
       

       

      • Upvote 2
    • Antimony

      Posted

      52 minutes ago, tanba said:

      If I was implementing this, I would be blurring before putting in the database. Now I’m also very doubtful that it can’t be unblurred, at least enough to reconstruct recognizable things, but blurring is also likely to save space, so even from a database and systems design perspective, I would be surprised if they saved the original images somewhere permanently, also due to legal liability. 

      There was one case with a pedophile (given the name "Mr Swirl" in the news) who had posted a manipulated image of his own face online and it took like...one guy with Photoshop who was like, "Uh, yea, that can be undone."

      Some reports suggest it took a little too long to find this one guy and perhaps the confidence of said pedophile made them thing the manipulation algorithm was more than it was but it was really...literally like the spiral twist function.

      I am mostly doubtful CE owns or bought any sort of interesting blurring algorithm. If we can pick past the diffraction of light with STORM...well. It just struck me as such an outlandish claim. 

    • JermajestyDuggar

      Posted



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.