• Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal

Totally Not A Blog

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
  • entries
    8
  • comments
    59
  • views
    921

A Theory Too Far (+ CAT PHOTOS)

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Vex

317 views

+Since Free Jinger is a snark site I feel that it's okay for me to extend the snark to my not-a-blog, although my snark topic has nothing to do with FJ or religion. In fact, it's about a different kind of fundamentalism altogether.

Let's talk about Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire theory channels on YouTube.

I am an avid reader of the books. Back in the day I was a fan of the show as well, but that's been waning since season 4 and I only continue watching because aspects of the show apart from the script and story are amazing (incredible performances, cinematography, costumes and scenery), plus of course it's my only taste of The Winds of Winter (apart from the sample chapters).

I discovered early on that I don't really fit in with the ASOIAF fandom, because I don't theorise. Theorising is a major part of the fandom for the books and the show. I will only consider theories with strong textual evidence and even then the only two major theories I've ever bought into were R+L=J (the most famous theory, about Lyanna Stark and Rhaegar Targaryen being Jon Snow's parents) and Gravedigger (The Hound is alive and living as a monk in the Quiet Isles).
There are some minor theories that I think are highly probable, such as the man in Oldtown who steals the key to the Citadel being Jaqen H'Ghar and minor theories that are all but confirmed like Ser Robert Strong's identity. The show has given the answer to all but one of those two theories.
Basically, it takes a lot to convince me and the evidence must be based in the text, or something Martin has said (but text is always the most convincing since George is only human and has made mistakes that his editors and proof readers later corrected). Using one of your theories to prove another of your theories is never going to fly with me, but that's exactly what so many theorists do.

I subscribe to many Game of Thrones and ASOIAF theory channels on YouTube. One of these channels is run by a guy called Preston Jacobs who has a bit of a bum rap in the fandom for coming up with outrageous theories.
Well, the people who criticise him should see some of the smaller channels I've found, because they are so completely out there that it's insane at times.

One has become my favourite just based on the sheer intensity with which they push their theories, and because they honestly believe they're helping to 'bring clarity' to the show and books.

I want to be clear that I have nothing against the channel or the people running it, I just find their work to be outlandish and at times comically so.
For example, they've made a five part series (with each part being roughly 30 minutes) arguing that Catelyn Stark is literally the worst character in the series. Not Ramsay Bolton, who hunts girls for sport and then rapes and flays them (sometimes alive, sometimes dead depending on how good their sport was) and systematically tortured and broke down Theon, not Euron Greyjoy who cuts the tongues out of his crewmen, raped his younger brothers, tortures and mutilates people on a regular basis.
Not Littlefinger, who is responsible for starting the War of the Five Kings, framed Sansa and Tyrion for the death of Joffery, pushed Lysa Arryn out the Moon Door and then blamed Marillion the singer, who eventually died for his supposed crime, and is arguably plotting to murder Sweetrobin, who is a seven-year-old boy. There are so many horrible people, but they sincerely believe that Cat Stark is the worst of them all because she's selfish and treats Jon poorly and is totally plotting with Maester Luwin and has Southron ambitions.

They once scoffed at me in the comments for thinking Val the Wildling was just that - Val the Wildling, rather than a highborn maid from Dorne. It made my day that they replied to me!
They're definitely my favourite theory channel, I watch everything they put out. Their biggest flaw (apart from assuming they're making things clearer for their viewers) is using their arguments as evidence to prop up other arguments. For example, if they had a theory about Joffery's wedding pie being made with ravens instead of pigeon, and they had another video about the importance of ravens to the story, they would use the video about the pigeon pie being made from ravens as evidence of the importance of ravens to the story, even though it's a theory rather than a fact.
If they scaled back on the whole 'we're bringing clarity' thing and used only canon sources instead of their own theories as the basis for other theories I think they'd be quite a successful small channel. I think they stretch way too far when creating arguments, but I can't deny that their videos are interesting. I feel bad for Preston getting so much negative press in the community when other people with smaller channels are guilty of way more out there theories.


People who consider themselves GoT/ASOIAF theorists tend to fit into one of two categories: Those who see symbolism in everything and take it too far and those who take things literally and take the literalism too far.
Sometimes things ARE literal. Sometimes things ARE symbolic. It's just when people become fundamentalists about it that things fall apart.


As promised: CAT PHOTOS

 

 

606.png

607.png

608.png


8
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


5 Comments


clueliss

Posted

Not a GoT theorist of any sort.  Oh - and I'm here for the cat porn.

4

Share this comment


Link to comment
Vex

Posted

8 hours ago, clueliss said:

Not a GoT theorist of any sort.  Oh - and I'm here for the cat porn.

Aren't we all here for cat porn though? I need to take more photos. The box one killed me with adorableness.

5

Share this comment


Link to comment
acheronbeach

Posted

I won't lie, I came here just for adorable cat pictures.  

2

Share this comment


Link to comment
JabberJabber

Posted

Oh such a floofy kitty and those sweet paws. Bad day instantly made a bit brighter by kitties. 

2

Share this comment


Link to comment
13 hours ago, JabberJabber said:

Oh such a floofy kitty and those sweet paws. Bad day instantly made a bit brighter by kitties. 

My husband and I always talk about how he's the floofiest cat we've ever seen. They really do make my day. I miss having my golden oldie with me (we decided it was best to let her stay with my parents rather than have a blind and deaf 18-year-old cat learn to navigate a new space), but I visit her all the time.

2

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Maggie Mae

      Posted

      29 minutes ago, louisa05 said:

      But that is a far different goal than getting a degree or working in a certain field. You achieve those goals by going out and doing the work necessary to get them. It's all on you. Getting married requires another person agreeing to make a lifelong commitment.

      I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around the idea of getting married as a goal, TBH. A milestone, sure. A memorable event? Yes. But an actual goal? I mean, when I set goals - let's say I want to run a marathon. I have a plan for that. I determine which marathon I want to do, look at the course, determine my level of fitness and what I need to do for training. If it's hilly, I add hill repeats into my training schedule. Then I create a schedule and schedule my life around work and than. (Side note: I have not run a full marathon.) If I want to make more money, I create a plan - I figure out what value I'm bringing to my company and negotiate a raise. I schedule the meeting, I practice my ask. If I want to go back to school, I would figure out a plan to pay for it and the work out the scheduling. 

      If I want to get married I what? Beg my boyfriend repeatedly? Poke holes in the condoms? Break up with him and download Tinder?  

       

      29 minutes ago, louisa05 said:

      The notion that a girl not growing up and getting married is a devastating shock is, frankly, the exact patriarchy most people on this forum disagree with. 

      Preach it. 

      1
    • louisa05

      Posted

      14 minutes ago, Maggie Mae said:

      What exactly are these rights and privileges? And why? 

      You get some rights pertaining to the marital relationship. My mom could sign my dad into the hospital when he could no longer sign his own name. I could not without a Power of Attorney. A partner not married to someone would not be able to without a POA, either. A woman on a cancer caregiver support forum I use was devastated when her partner died and his father came and took the body for cremation against her wishes. Unfortunately, in the absence of legal documentation, with no marriage, the father was the next of kin and had that right. 

      But if there are rights pertaining to general life (rather than specific to a relationship) that a single person is denied, I'm not sure what those are. No one told me. 

      2
    • CorruptionInc.

      Posted

      3 hours ago, Jug Band Baby said:

      My ex-best friend told all of us chosen to be in her wedding party not to get pregnant unless we we willing to get an abortion before the wedding since she didn't want anyone looking fat or for any pregnant belly to take any attention away from her.  

      I knew a woman that was furious that her matron of honour was going to be pregnant at her wedding. Her exact words were: "this is MY day and it's not about HER! How dare she be pregnant at my wedding!".

      I didn't like that woman already, but after that comment...

      1
    • Black Aliss

      Posted

      On 4/18/2017 at 8:07 PM, Jellybean said:

      Thanks for sharing that recipe @mango_fandango. I've never seen a guacamole recipe with cream in it. Is that a US thing (anyone?), or is that just Erika? I use my brother's recipe - no idea where he got it, but it is just avocado, lime juice, red onion, red chilli, olive oil and coriander (cilantro). Not quite as easy as Erika's version, but pretty close, especially as we keep coriander in the freezer all chopped and ready to go - no defrosting required.

      No, it's not a US thing. Except for the olive oil your recipe is far more typical (read: that's how I make it)

      You've probably also never seen anyone try to stretch one avocado to feed 9 kids. . . . I know I haven't.

      0
    • feministxtian

      Posted

      My mother finally got her license when she was close to 40. She HATED driving, I mean HATED it. And, because she was so uptight behind the wheel, she actually caused accidents. Fortunately my dad pretty much taught me how to drive. He was a very laid back driver, rarely got excited over the stupidity on the road...I'm much the same way. I'm comfortable driving in the city, I'm comfortable driving on the freeway and I'm comfortable driving on the track. However, because of my love of muscle cars and speed, I usually scare the hell out of anyone who's riding with me. Oh well, I know what I'm doing, I know what my car will do and I have many years' experience driving muscle cars...my first car was a 1972 Chevy Nova, 350cid, Holley 650 on top, Dana 9 inch ass, posi gears. Ran 70's on front and 50's on the back. Man I miss that car...now I drive a 2004 Mustang GT, 4.6l V8, full headers to X-pipe exhaust, 3.73 gears in the ass, 245-45's all the way around. She only puts about 350hp to the back wheels...I'm looking to boost that to north of 400 soon. 

      1