Jump to content

Looking For a Clue

  • entries
    100
  • comments
    213
  • views
    16,265

Apocolypse? Okay. Works for me.


clueliss

1,066 views

So one of 'those things' rolling around in my often warped, twisted brain lately has been the pondering of Trump as a sign of the apocalypse.  I'm coming at this as someone who used to be rather into eschatology (the study of the end times) (blame Jerry Jenkins/Tim Lahaye and the Left Behind series - which I now consider to be drek for the writing alone).  And over the last 17 years or so I've seen A LOT of finger pointing at various political or religious figures (usually Catholic) being the anti-christ.  George W Bush, Barak Obama, & Pope Benedict all made various lists at one point or another for various reasons.  

And then Trump hit.  And he was elected.  I no longer have my finger on that sort of pulse and have no desire to go looking for that sort of nut job logic.  (I have my own nut job brain for that).  And the thought occurred to me in the last few weeks, hmmm what if Trump is the anti-christ and the religious right (or Pharisees as I think of them these days) may have just given us Satan's minion right into the White House.  

Humor me here.  Because among some people he is a popular figure.  Not here at FJ of course.  He's very divisive.  And he's in bed with Russia - which among the eschatology folks is always a big bonus check mark for any potential Antichrist figure due to scriptural interpretation of the book fo Revelation (and other scripture throughout the Bible).  

So I just pulled up Huffington Post on the interwebs (yes, I should be working, I'm not).  and I find THIS:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/steve-bannon-apocalypse_us_5898f02ee4b040613138a951?

I may have snort laughed.  It might be a good thing that food or liquid was not in my mouth when I saw the article.  There's a video that I'm going to have to go back and watch later when I am not at work.  I'm giving the link only because the article is long.  Bottom line, Bannon thinks that the end is near and is out to save us from the evil Muslims.  I of course and looking at the whole thing thinking that he's in bed with the devils own and handing the keys to the country over to Satan.  But that's me.  

  • Upvote 4

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

I have had the same thought about Trump or Bannon fitting the description of the antichrist. I made it to book 8 or 9 of the Left Behind series. How far did you get?

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

Until the rapture.  Then they started the prequel thing and I say nope.  

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

I just pulled "Left Behind" off the shelf. I am going to reread it and look for parallels to current events. I blame you for this.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

Another dandy in that vein is the fiction of Joel Rosenberg.  I stopped reading him after I found too many errors in a novel he wrote.  Spelling/grammar he has enough sales that he should be able to afford a line editor for that.  Sloppy stuff.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
purple_summer

Posted

4 hours ago, clueliss said:

Until the rapture.  Then they started the prequel thing and I say nope.  

You mean the Glorious Appearing/start of the millennial kingdom? I read all of the adult books and roughly half of the kids books. I stopped somewhere around number 36.... 

I've thought about this a bit (but not too much because panic attacks) and I may or may not have given everyone in the current administration a left behind character equivalent. Truthfully, there are other Christian "end times" series that were much more terrifying so when I see/think  of parallels to them I'm SUPER freaked out.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

Yes, the Glorious Appearing stuff.  I will confess to reading the kids books as an adult.  

Link to comment
purple_summer

Posted

@clueliss I was a kid when I read everything, I got tired of waiting for the kid's series to finish so I read all of the adults ones instead.

I'm still bitter about Judd and Vicki getting married at the end.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • BlackberryGirl

      Posted

      Ethyl kennedy had 5 csections,  including Rory who was born after Bobby’s assassination.

      I had 3 sections. Elisabeth was huge, and transverse/diagonal, never would have made it. Rebecca was ordinary size but at 5 months, I ruptured my uterine ligaments and had 4 months bedrest. Soooooo c section. Then James was a section, since I’d had 2 and I nearly died  from the anesthesia. Damn that was scary. I heard numbers go lower and lower and the dr saying push fluids and everything swirled around me.. so got my tubes tied before I left the OR. 

    • postscript

      Posted

      I get the impression the Bontrager marriages are semi-arranged. Marlin and the other patriarch decide two of their kids would be a good match, tell the kids to pray about each other as potential mates, and start planning the wedding. I don’t think Marlin would force his kids to marry anyone they didn’t get along with, but he sees parental approval as more important than romantic love. 

    • QuiverFullofBooks

      Posted

      10 minutes ago, 4boysmum said:

      Vba3c births (vaginal birth after 3 c-sections) are not common in the USA, but my doctor and I are pretty confident that it was a good choice for my situation.

      Michelle Duggar is very pro-VBAC (having had C-sections with the two sets of twins) and it worked well for her.

      • Upvote 1
    • 4boysmum

      Posted

      I (not a medical professional, but have had 6 children and spent a fair amount of time chatting with OBs) was told that 3 c-sections is a tipping point where, after that, future pregnancies will have higher risk of placental complications.  I understood it as more scar tissue = less favorable places for a placenta to implant in subsequent pregnancies and if it attaches to scar tissue it can cause serious problems.  I know some other posters here work in the field so maybe you can explain it better.

      With that said, I have had 3 c-sections and nobody told me to avoid pregnancy after the last one.  When I did get pregnant again I was all set to have a 4th c-section and no one seemed terribly concerned other than they did look at placenta placement carefully on ultrasound and said it was fine.  If it had not been fine they said I would have been transferred to Boston (which is fortunately just 45 minutes away) as a higher risk patient.  If a woman gets pregnant the baby has to come out one way or another.  It's not like they can force it to stay in forever because you already used up your allowed 3 surgeries, and the doctor said she had operated on women having at least 5 c-sections.

      I did not have the 4th c-section.  I changed doctors and pushed hard for a chance to vbac.  I have gone the vba3c route twice now, in an excellent hospital in Boston with an amazing doctor.  Vba3c births (vaginal birth after 3 c-sections) are not common in the USA, but my doctor and I are pretty confident that it was a good choice for my situation.

      • Upvote 3
      • Thank You 1
    • Dutch_girl

      Posted

      14 hours ago, JermajestyDuggar said:

       

      7524864B-7C71-445B-9D8F-412912B2C83F.jpeg

      No Abby, your children are not constantly running everywhere.. You on the other hand.. *cough* New York, Canada, Europe *cough*

      • Upvote 2
      • I Agree 2


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.